WJM wrote >Btw, the backlighted LCD seems to enter the 'low-end' range of bodies >now too....or where did that feature stop in the analog range? >3000? >500?
The 300 and 500 certainly don't have a backlit LCD, I think the 30 / 50 are the first models that do. David Heller wrote >But I still think the folks who buy $250 >Rebel film kits with a 35-80 lens are not interested in >trading up to a new digital $899 body. I'm sure those who have only got a 35-80 lens aren't interested but I don't think they really need an SLR anyway - for the people like me who have bought a 300 because they'd rather spend the money on glass than bodies, the 300D looks quite appealing. (The biggest lens I've ever used on my 300 is the EF 300 2.8 IS, unfortunately I only got to borrow it for 10 minutes) -- Registered Office: Roke Manor Research Ltd, Siemens House, Oldbury, Bracknell, Berkshire. RG12 8FZ The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential to Roke Manor Research Ltd and must not be passed to any third party without permission. This communication is for information only and shall not create or change any contractual relationship. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
