Citeren Jim Davis Nature Photography <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If you're into > hiking, then lighter is better, and so the 70-200 f4 IS would be > swell. I guess the IS is a typo for the 70-200 IS? Would be nice if it came out, but it would kannibalise with the 2,8 IS I slept over it (another) night. I think I will buy the 85 1,8 (or the 135 2??) for portrait (because of it's nice backgroundblur, which I can't achieve with my 28-105) and a 70-200 4 (because I think this lens will deliver more snap in my pictures than the 100-300 4,5-5,6). To combine I will buy a Canon 1,4 TC. Thanks for all your thoughts! Leeuwtje -- _____________________________________________________________________ Zon Gratis ADSL. De voordelen van gratis internet met de snelheid van ADSL. Zonder abonnementskosten en zonder vast contract. Je betaalt alleen voor de tijd online. Nu zonder aansluitkosten en met gratis modem. Bestel snel op zonnet.nl. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
