How serious are you about going over to digital? Because you might need to re-think your lens set completely of you use a camera which gives the effect of multiplying the focal length of the lens by 1.6.
Bill
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Hi,
Ok I saved some money and want to get the quality of my lenses one step up before I invest in digital (decided to keep scanning slides for a year and go for glass). Now I photograph with an EOS 50E and Canon 20-35 3,5-4,5 Canon 50 1,8 Canon 28-105 3,5-4,5 Canon 100-300 4,5-5,6 Sigma 400 5,6 APO / Macro
I shoot people (studio), landscapes en animals. See also http://www.photo.net/photodb/member-photos?include=all&photo_id=2016035
I have the choice for:
A 85 1,8 135 2 200 2,8 (or a 135 2 with a 1,4 TC) TC 1,4
B 70-200 2,8 IS TC 1,4
C 70-200 4 135 2 or 85 1,8 TC 1,4
I know the 135 2 is sharp and I know IS is good stuff. I know all photodo ratings ...
Questions: - Will I shoot nice portrait with the 70-200 IS in a studio or outside? - Will I have to change lenses often when choosing for primes and shooting landscape? - Can I let my tripod at home when shooting landscape with the IS? - Can you give me your opinion on handling en the three choices?
I guess all three choice are good. Could I say A=quality B=comfort C=budget?
Thanks! Leeuwtje
-- Outrageous organ grinder warps Bill Welch's evenly-lumbered network!
* **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
