--- Javier Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That gets me thinking. > Seeing as how Canon may be thinking in the way of > creating a universal standard as was once tried with > M42 and PK. That would make a lot more sense for all > of us. The Canon bayonet is better than anything > else > and is almost a universal recipient for lenses. > > Not likely, I don't think. In the long run Canon makes more money on lenses than on bodies, I suspect. Making it even easier for other people's lenses to fit Canon bodies isn't in the company's best interest.
===== Bob Meyer I wish I knew what I know now, when I was younger... http://www.meyerweb.net/epson __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
