> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kotsinadelis,
> Peter (Peter)
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 7:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EOS To IS or Not to IS
>
>
>
>
> Bob Talbot wrote (edited):
>
> Bold statements Chip.
> But ... go on, be honest ... how many people in the world have
> *actually* given both lenses an extended & fair side-by side trial?
> Two?
> I bet a non-IS lens is faster focusing than an IS one: or even the
> Canon one with the IS turned off will respond faster (?).
>
> Canon lenses are the best (IMO) but actually, when it comes to it,
> procedural factors (how you use the lens) are dominant in determining
> the outcome.  A badly focused Canon lens is worse than a focused
> practically every time ;o)  Camera shake will kill every image.
> Award-winning images have been taken on cheap lenses.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------
> Bob, et al,
>
> The main reason I use a Canon system is to take advantage of IS.
> Sharpness is the holy grail but there are many lenses that are equally
> sharp as Canons.  I had 3 SLR bodies, 13 lenses, and when Canon
> came out with the 28-135mm IS I sold it all and switched.  I never looked
> back and was very pleased with the results. Since then I have acquired
> several other Canon and non-Canon lenses.  I own the 28-135 and
> 100-400 Canon IS lenses. Great lenses.
> If people would only concentrate on composing a taking a photo instead
> of simply lusting after the holy grail of sharpness, they would
> be far better
> off.
> As Alfred Eisenstadt said, "I don't care for lens tests. If I
> like a lens I use it."
>
> Peter K
>
>


Hi Peter K,

I'm with you on most of this so please don't get bent out of shape, I was
only yanking your chain (a little).  Let's have some fun, it's Friday!


Cheers/Chip


*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to