I think I understood what you were trying to say ;-) Reciprocity in extreme exposure conditions aside, I would expect ISO 100 to require a similar exposure whether I was using film or a sensor, otherwise what's the point of even assigning an ISO to the digital?
Tom P. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Rafael Ramirez > Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 12:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: EOS sensor sensitivity > > > I am sorry I did not explain myslef clearly in the last email. > what I am looking for is for some type of cheat sheet that > would help figure out the digital performance in low light > conditions I have manage to find a lot for film but none for Digital. > what is a correct exposure for city light or moon light or > candle light at iso 100? > > with no moon you can multiply this for 2 or 3 for the same > photo would be around 15 to 20 min. > you can see some examples I posted of this photos in this web site. > > http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/user.php?u_id=5632 > > again thanks all of you for taking the time to read this and > respond to it. > > > Rafael Ramirez Lee > > > > Tom P. > > > > >The exception to this that may be relevant to the original > query about > >night photography is when reciprocity failure occurs. This > is generally > >not a problem for digital bodies but a film that is rated at > 100 ISO in > >normal lighting may well only be 50 ISO or less under low light > >conditions. The only way to know is to check out the data > sheet for the > >film (I think you can download them from Fuji or Kodak's web sites > >these days), > > * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
