I am surprised that no one mentioned this thus far (I am in the digest mode,
so maybe someone already did.)  I remember reading in Shutterbug earlier
this year that the Sigma 120-300mm F/2.8 is better optically than Sigma's
own 300mm F/2.8 and cheaper too!  While there might be other issue like
focus speed, durability, etc ...., I believe that Sigma is now offering a 4
year USA warranty and that should cover any potential problems, except for
the obvious user abuse, impact damage and so on.  Anyway back to the
article, I also remember reading that it's only slight less sharp than
Canon's 300mm F/2.8.

Does anyone on this list own one of these?


*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to