Ken......I'm quite sure it was a Tamron, but it really doesn't matter. Whoever
it was, hasn't reported back here that it's been fixed yet.
OK, Fred. Could be. I'm expressing surprise and particular interest because it really would be the first in my experience, not that that's the end-all of anything. I actually *do* think it matters if a compatibility problem has been found between Tamron and Canon EF mount, since to date they are rare to non-existent. If there was a problem, I'd be willing to bet it was in the line of a malfunction rather than an incompatibility. I did go through the entire recent thread entitled "3rd party 300/2.8s" which this discussion stemmed out of, and there was no mention of Tamron problems that I found.
Hopefully, if you're correct, the originator of that complaint will pipe up and fill us in.
Ken
* **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
