On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 Harman Bajwa wrote:

>> Hi Fred,
>> 
>> Isn't this the case for E-TTL II,
>> not for the > original E-TTL? 
>> The new version uses the distance
>> information provided with some
>> lenses (mostly ring USM) and reverts
>> to standard E-TTL with other lenses.
>
> Although I am no expert in E-TTL II,
> but from what I have read so far, it
> seems to me that flash metering
> in E-TTL II is different (ie uses a
> new or improved way of calculating
> required flash exposure) from ETTL
> even in the absence of distance
> information. If that is true, then
> it would be incorrect to say that
> E-TTL II reverts to ETTL in the
> absence of distance information.

Hi Harman,

You're correct, E-TTL II uses a new
evaluative metering method even when
distance info is not available from
the lens in use.  The D30 & D60 had
a problem with E-TTL to do with the
evaluative flash metering linked to
the current focus point.   Mind you
this wasn't the only flash problem,
but canon improved flash metering on
the 10D by reverting to centre-weighted
metering for flash.

E-TTL II bodies have re-introduced
evaluative metering for the bodies
equipped with it, as well as using
the distance info available from certain
lenses.  This metering evaluates the
whole frame rather than just the area
linked to the current focusing point.
I believe it's supposed to remove the
need to use FEL when recomposing and
helps reduce the impact of highly
reflective areas in shot.

I didn't mention all that as I was 
originally trying to make the point
that *lenses* don't have e-ttl. Certain
Canon lenses can assist E-TTL II by
providing distance information to the
*camera body* which uses it as part of
the flash metering algorithm.

However the other component of E-TTL
(the improved metering method) is
also (from what I hear) a contributing
factor in improving flash metering.
I probably should have mentioned it. :)

Cheers
Gary



This message has passed through an insecure network.
Please direct all enquires to the message author.

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to