----- Original Message ----- From: "Schlake (William Colburn)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 12:30 PM Subject: Re: EOS Digital Camera Reliability
> I bought myself a 300D in October, and I'm on image number 239_3972. > That is 13,972 pictures taken if I interpret the scheme correctly. I've > had my camera lock up with the mysterious Error 99 once (with a Canon > lens attached), and only had one image that was corrupted and unusable. > > On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 08:22:39PM +0100, Cotty wrote: > >>In his latest mailing, David Cardinal, the editor of DigitalPro Shooter, > >>makes the statement that Digital SLRs are less reliable than Film. > >> > >>Have any of the heavier shooters on this list found this? > > > >I am a very light shooter - just about 10,000 frames in just under 2 > >years with a D60. It has performed faultlessly, always. > > -- void *(*(*schlake(void *))[])(void *); /* http://www.nmt.edu/~schlake/ */ Speaking of error messages, in a loose sort of way, does anyone know what "Errr84" means? I got it the other day with my D30 and Tokina 28-70 2.6-2.8. Skip Middleton http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
