On 11 Aug 2004 at 15:35, Chip Louie wrote:
> That being said the AF performance of the EOS 1DII vs. the 1D is not by
> itself a reason to move up to the 1DII though there are other improved
> features that made me look closely at a 1DII.
But the problem with analog camera's is that they can hardly improve
any further on *other* points....only digicams can (for now that is;
they too will run into a wall within 1-2 generations; even pixel-
overkill requires better lenses at some point)....and they can hardly
justify an 1V/mark-II for an AF-upgrade only....
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
