--- "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Alex Z wrote (edited): > > ...What may bother people here is any "theoretical" claims > > not backed up by an actual experience with given > > subject. Handholding/tripod issue has little to do with all that, > but > > once again, nobody is purseading you with forking out lots of cash > for > > 24/28-70L lens, your satisfaction if only what matters for you, so > if > > you happy with yuor current stuff - keep on, better spend > > money on film or photo advantures. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Alex, > > You hit a very good point. If the individual is happy with what they > are > using that is all that matters. Many people get emotional when they > start talking about equipment they own and why they bought it and how > great it is. If you remove the emotion and look at the facts, at > middle > apertures it does not make sense to only use L glass. However, if you > shoot wide open that is the reason you want L glass because they are > better wide open and wide open quality is what pros want in a lens. > > Peter K Yes Peter, no objection here. :-) Though I do not only value open aperture performance, but also additional factors such as built quality, hope for superior reliability over years, for instance. Alex __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
