On Thursday August 19 2004 12:24 pm, Ken Durling wrote: > At 09:13 AM 8/19/2004, you wrote: > >Beware of this link, if you notice the RAW and large .jpg files are > >specified as 3072x2048 resolution, this only provides 6.3 Megapixel, not > >8.2 MP the camera is alleged to have. And the burst rate is indicated at > > 5 FPS up to 9 shots which makes no sense for a camera that is supposed to > > have 25 frame buffer. I don't know for sure but those sound similar to > > the 10D camera !! These are at least the two inconsistancies on this > > link. > > Interesting! Good eye, I think. ;-) Be curious to see how this pans > out. I also find the "20D" somewhat inconsistent with Canon's prevailing > numbering system, but I know that's just a hunch.
The following site also has incorrect data. Fred http://www.pictureline.com/digital/dcameras/dcanon/eos20D.html -- "Running Windows on a Pentium is like getting a Porsche but only being able to drive it in reverse with the handbrake on." * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
