> I refuse to use Sigma, for a number of reasons, one > of which is their > construction is no where as good as Canon, and > neither is the glass and > coatings on the glass.
If budget matters I believe that Sigma, is, nowadays a good choice specially the EX line. I cannot understand your point as I'm a owner of a wide Leica equipment -rangefinder and reflex -and that does not impede me using Canon, cameras and L lenses. Should I say "I refuse to use Canon as construction, glass and coating are not at the Leica level"? I think not. Sigma has a market space and I used some optically excellent lenses from them though building quality wasn't very good but with normal care they lasted for years. Felix * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
