On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 23:41:38 -0600, "Tom Pfeiffer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to:
>I agree there's no reason to spend the money for the Canon tube, it's not an >optical device. But if you really want a 25mm tube (which I did, too), the >sets aren't much help because they have 12mm, 20mm and 36mm tubes. Kenko >does make a 25mm tube which is sold separately. I have it and it works fine, >although now that I've got a good bellows setup and a 180mm macro, I don't >use it very often. Yes, I have the Kenko 25mm tube. It's great on the 100-400. However, on shorter lenses like the 85 or 50, you'll need a 12mm tube. The 25 is just too much. -- Jim Davis, Nature Photography: http://jimdavis.oberro.com/ Motorcycle Relay Kits: http://www.easternbeaver.com/ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
