Bud wrote re: the 1D Mark II versus the 1D:
It's hard to imagine there is any huge benefit for portrait work.
Ummm...wrong (my opinion). And you're somewhat contradicting yourself (by your later statements). The image quality difference between an original 1D and a 1D Mark II seems significant. I use a 20D, and the difference in image quality from the 1D I use and the 20D is very significant to me. Now, the 20D as far as camera construction quality is a cheap camera (in terms of durability/build) compared to the 1D (or 1D Mark II). But, I'm guessing that the 1D Mark II will show the same significant quality difference, *especially* when cropping is needed and in general terms of image quality.
-- Bud Kuenzli
In cyberspace when you get where you're going you still don't know where you are.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
