On 12 Dec 2004 at 7:06, Bob Talbot wrote:

> > But at the same time they risk a total-system switch....
> Good Point WJ.
> I guess that's why with the "new" format they had to keep backward
> compatability (body to lens).
> 
> 
> > And in that case, a Minolta with camera-side IS might be more
> > attractive....;))
> For sure: having IS built in to the body sounds a clear advantage (if
> it works as well).  It would make all your old lenses IS too.
> 
> 
> > Most interesting risk/challenge right now:
> > Pro's shifting to a 1.6x sensor....in the Mamiya ZX that is, with
> > 36x48mm sensor.
> Where did you hear that?

While reading press-maps at the PhotoKina....:)) 
What triggered my interest instantly is the fact that it has a user-
removable anti-alias filter....by this the camera could then simply 
be converted to a 'clean' IR-sensitive camera (not requiring the 
silly long exposures as most DSLR's do (unless you have the camera 
permanently modified like this: http://www.irdigital.net )), or even 
be converted with a filter just like that very swiftly (and not 
permanently).

> Why would anyone want a bigger sensor anyway (rhetorical) ;o)

Either more pixels, or same pixels & less noise/more sensitivity 
(though that would be offset by the nearly always smaller aperture of 
MF-lenses).
I for sure wouldn't mind an IR-camera with better sensitivity than 
the 12ASA I get now with Kodak HIE & a 87C filter....:))

 
> 
> 
> > It's only a tad larger than a 35mm pro-DSLR....:))
> > (and not even much more expensive, if the promises are held)
> Mmm ... you might tempt me away from Canon

Design is quite sexy too.
Can be had as all-new 'unibody' and as rotating system-back for the 
existing 645AF body btw....even more system-expansion....:))
 
> 
> 
> I'm confused.
> If Nikanolta between them can't mass produce bigger FF sensors "for
> technical reasons" - how on earth could Mamiya turn out a 36x48 one
> without it costing as much as a Ferrari?  Something doesn't sound
> right.

The product-cycles become faster and faster....miss one, and you see 
a quantum-leap, a new species....:))

CC to IR-list.
--                 
Bye,

Willem-Jan Markerink

      The desire to understand 
is sometimes far less intelligent than
     the inability to understand

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to