On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:06:46 +0000, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to:
>>>Jim, I don't think a flash would have conveyed the same mood here, for >>>example: >> >>True, the candid amateur quality maybe not, but a true pro would have >>used several lights to get a natural effect that looks way better than >>your candid. > >Sorry but that's complete bollocks. > >A true pro (whatever that is) *could* have used several lights to get a >natural effect that *may or may not* look way better than [Tom's] candid. > >If the 'true pro' was shooting during a performance, he would not be >using flash. Period. So it's come down to bollocks has it? I'm out of this. You guys shoot whatever you want. YMMV means Your Mileage May Vary. -- Jim Davis, Nature Photography: http://easternbeaver.com/ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
