Bill Gillooly wrote: Your arguments are not well thought out.
Lotus 123 stated on the box, "system requirements" DOS 3.1, it did not state "Intel compatible." Same for 8-track this argument is like "my FD lenses don't work on EOS" the lenses stated "compatible with Canon FD." Sigma said these lenses were "EOS compatible," if they needed and upgrade to maintain that compatibility, they should have made enough upgrade parts for every serial number that they sold. Frankly, they should have issued a recall ad advertising the fact. Even if they offered an "upgrade" for a reasonable price, that would be good customer relations. Or, they should put a footnote in their catalog stating "compatible with the EOS cameras manufactured today, but may not be compatible with future EOS cameras." A class-action lawsuit by Sigma lens customers would change their tune! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----- OK Bill, and what does MS-DOS run on, an Intel. Yes, your FD lenses do not work, but Nikon's do, at the cost of them being unable to provide a faster optic like a 50mm F1 or 85mm F1.2 because of the restrictive size of the collar. The lenses are compatible, just not always 100%. I own 2 Sigmas and am more than pleased with them. There is no reason to have a class-action lawsuit because your case is so ridiculous it would be thrown out of court. I liken this to, "I always used regular gas in my Honda Civic, but I bought a new Acura and now must use Premium gas. So the new car I purchased is incompatible with my gas." Also, not all tires and rins and engine parts are 100% compatible. Peter K * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
