I still use a Canon 28-80 (mark 2, I think) that came with my EOS 100 13 years 
ago and wondered how it might compare with new independent designs.  I compared 
it with a friend's Sigma 28-135 and the edge quality of the Sigma, at f8-11, 
both 28 and 80, wasn't even close.  Centre pretty similar between the two at 
f8, Sigma worse wide open.  I also compared it with a Sigma 12-24 and that, 
too, was clearly worse.  Definitely still life in the old dog.  Then, I 
compared it with the L series standard zoom a few years ago and couldn't see 
much difference, so maybe I got a good one. 

Peter

Peter Hancock
Department of Psychology
University of Stirling
FK9 4LA, UK
phone 01786 467675
fax 01786 467641
http://www.stir.ac.uk/psychology/Staff/pjbh1

-- 
The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA.  Privileged/Confidential Information may
be contained in this message.  If you are not the addressee indicated
in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
prohibited and may be unlawful.  In such case, you should destroy this
message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  Please advise
immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
for messages of this kind.

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to