Hello Tom, Monday, September 26, 2005, 9:03:15 PM, you wrote:
> Hi, > On 9/26/05, Dieter Henkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > What on earth am I going to do with a 20mm f/2.8 prime on a >> > body with a full frame sensor? >> >> Puh. I want to have your problems... >> 20mm is still not wide enough for me. I'd like to have the 10-22 that >> I'm currently using on my 20D on any full-frame camera. :-) > How about the 17-40/4 L. It covers full frame. 17 is pretty darn wide > if you ask me. But I'm also the type who couldn't make the D21 work > for me. Awesome lens, I just couldn't work with the perspective. I meant 10-22mm on a full frame camera. That would be wide enough for me. :-) -- Best regards, Dieter Erwerbsregel #218 Manchmal kostet das was du umsonst bekommst, ganz und gar zu viel. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
