Good lord, that is terrible! Does this happen only on wides or only with fast lenses? ie, what results do you get with a 17-40/f4 (at 17 and wide open) or with a long fast (200/2.8, 300/2.8 ??)
I don't suppose you have a 1Ds (or its younger brother) to compare to? David On 10/3/05, Schlake (William Colburn) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is a small image to show off how bad f/2.8 is compared to f/5.6 on > a 20mm lens. I thought I had taken one at f/4, but the EXIF data tells > me I went straight from 2.8 to 5.6. > > http://infohost.nmt.edu/~schlake/5d/2point8vs5point6.jpg * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
