At 9:54 PM +0100 1/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,

I have holliday right now so time to think ..... my question has a high "freak" score .... you are all warned ...

I own a Bronica S2A with some Nikkor lenses. The S2A has a Bronica S2A bayonet & 57×1 thread with a 101.7
register (thank you Willem Jan).
Thus if I buy a 58mm Lens Reverse mount adapter and let a mechanic make a 57x1 to 58 mm adapter I could
use all my Bronica lenses on my EOS and still focus to infinity. Right?

Not necessarily. The Bronica lenses, in particular those shorter than 75mm, are retrofocus to allow room for the mirror _behind_ the lens. Reversing the lens will negate that, and you will find that the register of 101.7mm is on the wrong side. You will not be able to focus to infinity.

Would this be any usefull? Or is the resolving power of these 30 year old 6x6 lenses much lower as of Canon
gear. What focal lenght would a 40 mm 6x6 lens have on an EOS XT?


40mm is 40mm is 40mm. On an XT the lens would have an angle of view like any other 40mm; ie, slightly narrower than 'normal'.


Now the other side around. I have some nice EOS lenses wich I think the are good optical quality. When I look at my 40 mm Nikkor 6x6 lens I'm astounished that the the diameter of the glass is so small. I expected these lenses wider because the have to spread the light on 6x6 film behind them .... this made me think, some of my
EOS lenses have wider glass ....

Glass diameter isn't an indicator of much other than complexity of construction. Canon lenses are designed to cover a circle of 44mm or so at infinity, except for the TS lenses, which cover about 65 or so. Some tele lenses might cover a lot more, but the barrel is shielded to not allow that, because the extra angle of view would produce a lot of non-image forming light that will cause flare and reduce contrast.

Since the Canon lenses would be only useful for close-up stuff and would only be used for such, they will actually all cover 6x6 film at 1:1 when the lens is moved one focal length further away from the film plane than when it was focussed at infinity. At 1:1 they will cover twice the diameter they would at infinity, namely

One of the best setups I used for micro photography, in this case about 10:1, was using a reversed 13mm f/0.9 Switar from a Bolex 8mm movie camera reversed on bellows. Great optical quality, and actually bright enough to see something.

Could I use EOS lenses on my Bronica? Probably because of the film to lens distance I can't focus to infinity. But focus on short distance??? Or does the wide of the glass has nothing to do with it and is everything tuned by
different glass elements in the lens?

If it would work I could get a plastic lenscap and fix this together with a 57x1 thread.....


Thanks!
Leeuwtje


--
   *            Henning J. Wulff
  /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
 /###\   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to