On 19 Jan 2006 at 16:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I can remember the discusion if Canon IS Lenses where better than the
> Body-Integral Anti-Shake System of Minolta. At least now we know wich
> one was economical better ...
>
> http://konicaminolta.com/releases/2006/0119_03_01.html
>
> Appearantly Sony takes it further from now ...
>
> Leeuwtje
>
So now we finally don't have to wonder any more about the mysterious
stock/production status of the Konica IR750 film, each and every year
in the past....;((
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
