If f/4 is fast enough for you in the 17-40 and 24-105, why not with the 70-200 as well?
tomp > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > David Jurney > Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 10:20 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: EOS How important are these 30mm? > > > OK, I am looking to augment/overhaul my lens kit. I am > shooting with an > EOS 3 and am planning to purchase a 5D. I have a 28-105mm IS that I > have used as my general-purpose and travel lens. I had > decided to sell it and procure the 24-105mm f/4L IS, but then > I started thinking...and that is where the trouble started. > > I also want to add the17-40mm f/4L and I am strongly > considering the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS. Buying all three is a > little expensive so I have been considering getting just the > last two. That leaves a gap from 40mm-70mm. I suspect that > I do not shoot much in that range anyway. > What do ya'll think? > * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
