Well, I guess if none of you guys can see the point, that might explain why 
Canon can't, either.

Malcolm asked: What's wrong with Canon's EF 70-200 f4L?

Answer: it's 200mm, as opposed to 400mm.  Stick a 2x on it and it becomes a 400 
f8, as opposed to the 400 f5.6 that I have.  And sure, 200 x 1.6 is 320, but 
then 400 x 1.6 is 640.  It's still a full frame lens, so wastes half the light. 
 I realise that the optical difficulty is at the short end, but the weight is 
at the long end!  There is some gain, of course, because the optical quality in 
the centre is always going to be better.  Anyhow, no rumours, it seems, so if 
Canon don't want to compete, might have to start looking elsewhere.  I guess 
they figure that anyone who wants a nice telephoto should buy a 5D to attach it 
to.  Seems like a relatively short term strategy to me: there's nothing that 
magical about 24x36 frame size and a sensor that big is always going to be more 
expensive as are the lenses to cover it.  They will also presumably always be a 
bit less noisy, but given how good noise reduction software is now, not much of 
an issue.  Given a system costing, say, £5K and one costing £10K and weighing 
twice as much, I reckon most would suffer a tad more noise.   There will always 
be a few lugging view cameras up mountains!  No rush, my 10D still does very 
nicely.

Peter  

-- 
The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA.  Privileged/Confidential Information may
be contained in this message.  If you are not the addressee indicated
in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
prohibited and may be unlawful.  In such case, you should destroy this
message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  Please advise
immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
for messages of this kind.

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to