On 4/2/07, Bill Gillooly, discombobulated, unleashed: > >As a USM upgrade to my venerable EF 20-35mm f/2.8L, I'm considering one >of the newer lenses. > >Has anyone used them both and compared sharpness and linear distortion >between the EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM and the older EF 17-35mm f/2.8L USM? >Yes, I realize I get an extra mm at the wide-angle position with the former.
I presume you've seen this? <http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/16-35.shtml> I've already made my mind up and will be picking up a 24mm 1.4 L in the spring. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
