----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Gillooly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: EOS 16-35 vs. 17-35
That's pretty convincing.
Mr. Bill
It reflects my own experience with the lenses in question. I rented a
17-35L and ended up buying a Sigma 17-35 f2.8-4 because the marginal
difference in image quality wasn't worth 3x the price. I eventually bought
a 16-35L because it is way better than the Sigma.
Skip Middleton
www.shadowcatcherimagery.com
www.pbase.com/skipm
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
