I've got the 20-35mm L, maybe I need to find a friend with the 16-35mm L
and spend a day shooting and comparing.
The 17-40mm L sounds good too, but I'm trying to go with the "3-zooms"
for quick day trips and the extra aperture comes in handy.
Mr. Bill
Tom Pfeiffer wrote:
I've heard, but have no experience to back it up, that the 20-35L was better
than it's replacement, but without USM.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
