--- David Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The thing I don't understand is why are there so many different stock > agencies? Sure I can see a market for high cost stock like Getty, and > for cheap, royalty free stuff like Lucky Oliver or iStockPhoto. But > every time I turn the corner there seems to be another stock agency. > > Maybe I am missing something, but isn't the market saturated? > > Having said that, I plan to join Lucky Oliver :) > > David
David, I was thinking the same thing. I've bought high-cost from Getty for projects, and I've bought some lower-cost images from others (despite the fact that I am a photog, there are just some holes I cannot fill). And, you DO get what you pay for. I am stunned by the lack of quality of some of the images that are for sale out there. I would hope that those of us who take our photography seriously could improve the quality of the lower-end offerings that are in the marketplace. Maybe I'll join. I've got submissions in with several houses now. Jane __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
