On Nov 8, 2007 12:22 PM, Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:18:55 +0100 > Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well, we need to put some thoughts into this -- if we for example > > start building packages that require the newer libvirt today then > > users of CentOS 5.0 (5.1 is not released yet) and those still on RHEL > > 5.0.x would run into dependency issues when using EPEL. We should try > > hard to avoid that. That's why I suggested to keep "5.0" directories > > around for some weeks months -- but the idea was not that welcomed > > afaics... > > 5.0.x doesn't exist. 5.1.z will exist, for a period of time up to the > release of 5.4 I think, or 5.5. >
<grumpy id="old sys-admin"> So Red Hat didnt go with a 5.0.x? I am so glad they communicated that with a customer who banked on using it. At this point is there any assurance that 5.1.x will really exist? </grumpy> -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
