On Nov 8, 2007 1:07 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 08.11.2007 20:22, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:18:55 +0100 > > Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Well, we need to put some thoughts into this -- if we for example > >> start building packages that require the newer libvirt today then > >> users of CentOS 5.0 (5.1 is not released yet) and those still on RHEL > >> 5.0.x would run into dependency issues when using EPEL. We should try > >> hard to avoid that. That's why I suggested to keep "5.0" directories > >> around for some weeks months -- but the idea was not that welcomed > >> afaics... > > 5.0.x doesn't exist. 5.1.z will exist, for a period of time up to the > > release of 5.4 I think, or 5.5. > > Thx for the hint. > > But well, the problem round about stays the same until CentOS (and other > clones) ship 5.1. And we run into the same problem again for 5.1.z once > 5.2 ships. >
May I suggest repotags or using CentOS as the build system :). EPEL5.0.0 would be a good fix :). There I have fulfilled my monthly trolling requirements. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
