Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:08:10 +0100 > Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Which still does not solve the problem that started this thread... > > Correct. To solve the problem at the start of this thread, perhaps it > would make sense to pre-populate the buildsystem with the next point > release bits at the same time they're being staged for release, or > close to it, so that EPEL can on the same day of a point release claim > that they support that release. Just takes more cooperation between > EPEL leaders and Red Hat.
BTW ... if Red Hat would PROVIDE that SAME cooperation to CentOS, we would be more than happy to also RELEASE on the same day and solve this problem :D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
