Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:08:10 +0100 > Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Which still does not solve the problem that started this thread... > > Correct. To solve the problem at the start of this thread, perhaps it > would make sense to pre-populate the buildsystem with the next point > release bits at the same time they're being staged for release, or > close to it, so that EPEL can on the same day of a point release claim > that they support that release. Just takes more cooperation between > EPEL leaders and Red Hat.
How does that help the millions of CentOS users out there?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
