On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 07:39:51PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > There isn't any guideline either way. I usually prefer to use patches > myself, but this spec is based on one from Dag, and he used the perl > substitutions in there, so I left it in order to keep close to his spec.
So EPEL clamav is going to look like Dag's, not like the "regular" Fedora clamav? I'm not really a fan of the Fedora clamav packages, but I do have to live with them (for amavisd-new). How much pain is this fork going to cause me? Honestly, I think I'd rather volunteer to maintain Enrico's clamav spec in EPEL than even think about maintaining forked amavisd-new specs. Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)624-4440 Mobile: (618)567-7320 _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
