On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 14:06:13 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > - freshclam should work when the package is installed. Currently it > requires you to comment a line in a script for no reason I can tell.
Cannot find this in bugzilla. The /etc/sysconfig script disables the automatic update on purpose (to prevent unauthorized network access) and warns the user about that default. What is wrong with that? > - freshclam should not mail "root,postmaster,webmaster,clamav" on any > output. Is this in bugzilla? It also mails warnings and errors. > - freshclam should be set to use your local country mirror for updates. Is this in bugzilla? > - The milter should work with postfix. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/239037 > - The subpackages should be reduced and named in a way that an end user > could possibly know what they need to install for the functionality > they are looking for. For example, the upstream docs and every other > package talks about the 'freshclam' update program, it's not easy to > know that in fedora thats in the 'clamav-update' package. Just a %doc issue so far, IMO. Unless it is ruled that clamav must be in a single package. > - The useless 'sysv' subpackages should be folded into the other > subpackages until such a time as fedora stops using sysvinit by > default. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/322381 - WONTFIX > - clamscan looks for a /etc/clamd.conf file for config options, which > is not in that place. If it was it wouldn't work because it needs a > line commented before it's a valid config file. > > - The package could not remove the clamav user on removal. > > I'm sure I could look around for more issues. > > > Why can't a volunteer create and maintain a clamav configuration > > add-on package, which offers a single system-wide clamav daemon if > > that is requested by the clamav user base in Fedora/EPEL? > > I suppose someone could... thats not my issue however. My issues are in > the clamav package itself, not just not having a system wide clamd. The list is interesting, but it adds more than what I thought has been the primary (only?) issue with the Fedora clamav packages. _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
