On Dec 29, 2007 4:27 PM, Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, lonely wolf wrote: > > > On 12/29/2007 09:34 PM, Florin Andrei wrote: > > > > > Back to using Dag's repo - setup all sorts of yum exceptions, so that the > > > broken EPEL packages do not interfere with the good packages provided by > > > Dag. Welcome to the repo hell. :-( > > > > That't exactly what yum-priorities has been written for. Just setup rpmforge > > with a bigger priority over epel and you are done. > > Last time such a discussion popped up and I simply stated that RPMforge > and EPEL are not compatible and you are better off using only one of both > I was told to stop spreading FUD (by Rex Dieter). > > Apparently it stopped being FUD today ? >
I do not know. FUD is an overused acronym and probably is a corollary to Godwin's law. It also depends on the tone and how it was said. Email is not a medium to give tone or meaning to statements.. it is a medium for partisan bickering. This is not an issue that can be solved in a one paragraph email. It is a problem that will take a multi-line sets of emails and people reasonably listening to each other, asking for clarifications, and working towards and accepting an 'imperfect' middle ground. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
