On 15.01.2008 20:01, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 15.01.2008 19:23, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>> On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>> On 15.01.2008 19:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>>> /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | permission to use spec files in other projects >>>>> | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Misc >>>> Does anybody still care? Seems the Board either do not understand what >>>> we/I'm up to or they ignore it. >>> No one but you sees a problem. It's covered by the CLA. >> Please explain to me: What meaning has the CLA (a contract between a >> Fedora contributer and Fedora/Red Hat) to someone else that receives >> software from Fedora? >> I'm not familiar with US law, but in Germany a contract between A and B >> has no meaning to C. > CLA is not just a contract between A and B or more specifically it > allows the same rights to all recipients which in this case would > include C. I believe spot already explained that in > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-January/msg00031.html
Which I replied to in https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-January/msg00032.html with the words: [...] I can't know if the all work I get from Fedora was submitted by someone that signed the CLA. [...] Cu knurd _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
