On 15.01.2008 20:21, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 15.01.2008 20:01, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>> On 15.01.2008 19:23, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>>>> On 15.01.2008 19:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>>>>> /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | permission to use spec files in other projects >>>>>>> | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Misc >>>>>> Does anybody still care? Seems the Board either do not understand what >>>>>> we/I'm up to or they ignore it. >>>>> No one but you sees a problem. It's covered by the CLA. >>>> Please explain to me: What meaning has the CLA (a contract between a >>>> Fedora contributer and Fedora/Red Hat) to someone else that receives >>>> software from Fedora? >>>> I'm not familiar with US law, but in Germany a contract between A and B >>>> has no meaning to C. >>> CLA is not just a contract between A and B or more specifically it >>> allows the same rights to all recipients which in this case would >>> include C. I believe spot already explained that in >>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-January/msg00031.html >> Which I replied to in >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-January/msg00032.html >> with the words: >> [...] I can't know if the all work I get from Fedora was submitted >> by someone that signed the CLA. [...] > All the work definitely isn't but spec files would be.
Then I'm sure it can be written down to finally solve the iossue? > That is the only > thing you are worried about. Right? I think that's what people were worried about when the issue came up on this list. CU knurd _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
