On Mon, 12 May 2008 10:45:07 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Schwendt) wrote:
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 22:15:05 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > May 07 12:07:58 <smooge> We have a lot of new pacakges it > > would seem and some concerns that we have too many broken > > dependencies May 07 12:08:34 <nirik> note that broken deps > > are only ever in testing. > > Not true. See end of April. Yikes. You are quite right (of course). > And the most recent broken deps report showed 5 findings for > fedora-epel-5-i386. What's the reason for them? Incompatible upgrades > in RHEL5? Not sure... I will see about digging into them and filing bugs/hounding maintainers here. Will followup on this post when I have done so. > fedora-epel-testing-5-x86_64 is missing from the report, > and the ppc/ppc64 platforms are still missing, too, due to > misconfiguration. I will see about getting this fixed. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
