Hi, Kevin Fenzi a écrit : > On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:56:24 +0200 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Johan Cwiklinski) wrote: > > >> Fedora Extras repoclosure a écrit : >> >>> trasher AT fedoraproject.org >>> BackupPC - 3.1.0-2.el5.noarch >>> >>> ====================================================================== >>> Broken packages in fedora-epel-testing-5-x86_64: >>> >>> BackupPC-3.1.0-2.el5.noarch requires perl(Archive::Zip) >>> >>> >> Hi, >> >> I really do not know what's the problem here, the reported missing >> package is available on my CentOS 5.2 : >> # yum list perl-Archive-Zip >> perl-Archive-Zip.noarch 1.16-1.2.1 base >> >> >> Did I miss something ? >> > > I think this package might only be available in the 'client' rhel > stream and the server/scripts are only checking against the 'server' > stream. > > Can anyone confirm that? >
A friend of mine has confirmed that perl-Archive-Zip is only available for the client, not for the server. > If so, we should add in the client stream in order to at least run the > dep checker. > > >> Regards, >> Johan >> > > kevin > Since there is apparently no way for me (or for the perl-Archive-Zip) maintainer to specify in which of these branches our packages should go, I really do not know how to resolve these dependency problem. So what to do ? BackupPC will probably not being pushed to stable since there is a RHEL dependency issue, but everything seems to be OK under CentOS... And as I'm not an RHEL customer, I see no way to know that a such problem exists, no way to check it, no way to repair it... Regards, Johan _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
