Thorsten Leemhuis a écrit : > On 06.10.2008 14:58, Patrice Dumas wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 01:13:14PM +0200, Johan Cwiklinski wrote: >>> So what to do ? BackupPC will probably not being pushed to stable since >>> there is a RHEL dependency issue, but everything seems to be OK under >>> CentOS... And as I'm not an RHEL customer, I see no way to know that a >>> such problem exists, no way to check it, no way to repair it... >> These issues doesn't prevent packages from being pushed to stable. > > ...because that is done by a different repoclosure run that I do on > one of my private system against centos ;-)
Ok, I didn't know that... Thanks :) > >> ooo2txt that I maintain has have this issue since a long time, and it is >> in stable. I just ignore those missing deps messages, given that the >> issue has already been raised. > > Well, it would be good if that could get fixed in the depchecker > script that epel uses. The buildsys afaik has the packages from both > RHEL5 desktop and server in its repo. So why isn't that the case for > the repo that is used for dep checking? > > Cu > knurd > Regards, Johan _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
