On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 10:42:41AM +0000, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:07:43 -0800 > Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi folks; > > > > I recently submitted a package for review that is intended for EPEL > > only: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474430 > > > > Reason being that this python module is included already in Fedora, > > but is not present in RHEL 4 or 5. > > > > There wasn't really a procedure for this type of thing, so the product > > I filed it under was the standard "rawhide". > > > > Anything I should perhaps do differently in this case or am I going > > about it in the right way? > > Isn't the procedure for this to ask the Fedora maintainer if they're > interested in maintaining an EPEL branch for the package - if so, to > branch and build it possibly with you as comaintainer, if not, add you > as maintainer of a new EPEL branch? >
Sorry, I should have clarified better. The uuid module I'm packaging above is part of _python_ in Fedora (2.5 and newer?). So this module doesn't fall under those guidelines... :) Ray _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
