On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Adam Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > As the subject notes, nagios is in fact shipped by RedHat. > ..... > The reason I wanted to bring this up is that we say in our policy that > we do not ship packages that are shipped by RedHat in RHEL. But this > being a subscription channel that is not extremely popular, do we want > to revise that policy to say that we don't ship packages that are not > in the base channel of desktop/workstation/server/ap as those are the > most common or do we want to stick to the current policy quite > strictly?
As I understood it.. it was only for the base RHEL channels. Channels which are not available from a base subscription were not considered covered by our policy. > Just food for thought, it was a topic of conversation in #rhel today. > > -AdamM > > -- > http://maxamillion.googlepages.com > --------------------------------------------------------- > () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail > /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > -- Stephen J Smoogen. Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for? -- Robert Browning _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
