On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:34 AM, inode0 <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Adam Miller > <[email protected]> wrote: >> All this discussion is great and I think everyone has had solid >> concerns and good points but it still leaves the original question >> unanswered. >> >> Do we stick to our policy as is or do we want to make a revision? > > It seems to me looking in from the outside that you have already made > a revision to the policy by including 389, nagios, and possibly other > things. Might as well move on the figuring out what the real policy is > going to be and correctly documenting it. > <SNIP>
Well that's kind of my point, if we stick to the policy as it stands then we need to pull the violating packages. -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
