On 12/01/10 20:27, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Adam Miller
<[email protected]> wrote:
Here's a proposal:
Let's make an alteration to our current policy to something of the
effect that "we do not ship any package that has an openly available
RPM/SRPM located in any child directory of
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/ but we are unable to
verify that there will be no conflicts as not all channels are
published."
Beyond that I don't think there is any realistic expectation of us to
know what we could potentially conflict with if the information is not
publicly available.
-AdamM
"EPEL is purely a complimentary add-on repository and does not replace
packages in RHEL or layered products."
to
"EPEL is purely a complimentary add-on repository and does not replace
packages in RHEL. [Package conflicts are determined by what is openly
available from Red Hat's tree (currently located at
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/) ]
s/complimentary/complementary/
Paul.
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
