On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Adam Miller > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Here's a proposal: >> >> Let's make an alteration to our current policy to something of the >> effect that "we do not ship any package that has an openly available >> RPM/SRPM located in any child directory of >> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/ but we are unable to >> verify that there will be no conflicts as not all channels are >> published." >> >> Beyond that I don't think there is any realistic expectation of us to >> know what we could potentially conflict with if the information is not >> publicly available. >> >> -AdamM > > "EPEL is purely a complimentary add-on repository and does not replace > packages in RHEL or layered products." > > to > > "EPEL is purely a complimentary add-on repository and does not replace > packages in RHEL. [Package conflicts are determined by what is openly > available from Red Hat's tree (currently located at > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/) ] > <SNIP>
I like it, +1 here. Should we put this to a vote at the next meeting or do we want to take a poll here on the mailing list? -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
