On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:52 +0200, Andrew Colin Kissa wrote: > Is this some kind of joke ? What is the rationale behind this actually i > find exim and cyrus very robust pieces of software.
Deprecation and/or non-inclusion in RHEL is not always the result of a piece of software not being robust. And I say this as a major proponent of Exim myself, ever since I first deployed it on Debian a good decade ago (coming from years of Sendmail and Postfix exposure). On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 13:02 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > This question is probably best referred to your TAM. > The epel list seems like the wrong place for it. Indeed. Furthermore and just FYI, the RHEL 6 Beta list is here: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-beta-list And the RHEL 6 Beta Announce list is here: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-announce -- Bryan J Smith Senior Consultant Red Hat, Inc Professional Consulting http://www.redhat.com/consulting mailto:[email protected] +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile) mailto:[email protected] (Blackberry/Red Hat-External) -------------------------------------------------------- You already know Red Hat as the entity dedicated to 100% no-IP-strings-attached, community software development. But do you know where CIOs rate Red Hat versus other software and services firms for their own, direct needs, year after year? http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
