On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Bill Nottingham <[email protected]> wrote: > Manuel Wolfshant ([email protected]) said: >> What would be the proper way to ask for re-evaluation of nedit ? >> It has a pretty strange history: included up to RHEL 4, dropped in >> 5.0, readded in 5.3 (or 5.4).. now I see it being dropped again ... > > Well, it's a legacy editor that doesn't support the default encoding > that we have in both RHEL 5 and RHEL 6; given that it doesn't seem > quite appropriate for the main RHEL distribution. You can raise > a RFE in bugzilla, or with your support rep, etc.
I think this like some other technologies (tcsh, bog-standard vi, etc).. the shops that use them have a long history and get grumpy when their favorite tool isn't there (heck I had to keep a copy of vi around because vim was not compatible enough for some phd's.) I think there is a market for them, call it ring 6 (for its heresy not to have it installed :)). > Bill > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > -- Stephen J Smoogen. “The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance.” Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "We have a strategic plan. It's called doing things."" — Herb Kelleher, founder Southwest Airlines _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
