On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 11:22:52 -0600
Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:34:16 +0100
> Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Orion asked this a while ago, but no answer was forthcoming. What's
> > the right way to fix the problem outlined below (arising as there's
> > no 32 bit java on x86_64) ...
> 
> Sadly, I think we need a fix in mash to get epel to not multiarch some
> things. 
> 
> See https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4130
> 
> and hope we can find someone willing to work on mash to make this
> happen. 

mash will exclude a noarch package that has a ExcludeArch from the repo
for the arch so for rhel 5 you need to "ExcludeArch: ppc" and rhel 6
"ExcludeArch: ppc64"

Dennis

> > Thanks,
> > Jonathan.
> 
> kevin
> --
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: <build...@fedoraproject.org>
> > Date: 7 April 2013 05:25
> > Subject: Broken dependencies: vtk
> > To: vtk-ow...@fedoraproject.org
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > vtk has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
> > On x86_64:
> >         vtk-java-5.8.0-6.el6.1.i686 requires
> > libjawt.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) Please resolve this as soon as possible.
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list

Reply via email to